Emanuel Nash v. Raybon Johnson, Warden
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20192:19-cv-09545California1,328 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. CV 19-9545 JVS (SS) Date: November 15, 2019 Page 1 of
Title: Emanuel Nash v. Supreme Court of California
DOCKET ENTRY: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE MAGISTRATE
JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT THIS
ACTION BE DISMISSED AS SUCCESSIVE
PRESENT:
HONORABLE SUZANNE H. SEGAL, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
_Marlene Ramirez_ _______None_______ __None__ Deputy Clerk Court Reporter/Recorder Tape No.
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:
None Present None Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)
On October 31, 2019,1 Emanuel Nash, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (the “Petition”). Petitioner appears to be challenging his July 12, 2011 conviction and sentence on two counts of first degree murder, with numerous special circumstances, for which he is serving consecutive terms of life without the possibility of parole on each murder count, consecutive sentences of 25-