Emanuel Nash v. Raybon Johnson, Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20192:19-cv-09545California1,328 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 19-9545 JVS (SS) Date: November 15, 2019 Page 1 of

Title: Emanuel Nash v. Supreme Court of California

DOCKET ENTRY: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT THIS

ACTION BE DISMISSED AS SUCCESSIVE

PRESENT:

HONORABLE SUZANNE H. SEGAL, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

_Marlene Ramirez_ _______None_______ __None__ Deputy Clerk Court Reporter/Recorder Tape No.

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)

On October 31, 2019,1 Emanuel Nash, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (the “Petition”). Petitioner appears to be challenging his July 12, 2011 conviction and sentence on two counts of first degree murder, with numerous special circumstances, for which he is serving consecutive terms of life without the possibility of parole on each murder count, consecutive sentences of 25-

Under the “mailbox rule,” a pleading filed by a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.