Munford Paul Wilson v. J. Gastelo

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20195:19-cv-00759California740 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 Case No. ED CV 19-759 JAK (MRW) MUNFORD PAUL WILSON,

ORDER DISMISSING HABEAS

Petitioner,

ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

v. J. GASTELO, WARDEN, Respondent. 18 The Court dismisses this habeas action with prejudice for failure to prosecute and for failure to respond to Court orders. * * * 1. This is a habeas action involving a state prisoner. In February 1997, a state court jury found Petitioner guilty of first degree residential burglary. The trial court found that Petitioner had two prior felony convictions that qualified as strikes under the state’s Three Strikes law. The court sentenced Petitioner to an indeterminate term of 35-years-to-life in prison. 28 2. In 2016, Petitioner sought resentencing in state court based on the enactment of Proposition 36. The state superior court denied the request. The state appellate court affirmed the trial court’s decision. Petitioner apparently did not seek review of the matter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.