Sammy Ciling v. County of Riverside

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 22, 20195:19-cv-01184California456 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION 11 SAMMY CILING, ) No. ED CV 19-1184-DMG (PLA) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DISMISSING CASE PURSUANT ) TO RULE 41(a)(2) OF THE FEDERAL v. ) RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, et al., ) ) Defendant. ) ) 17 On June 26, 2019, plaintiff, filed a pro se civil rights action herein pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Complaint”). On August 8, 2019, defendant Bank of America filed a Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 12). Plaintiff did not timely file an opposition to that motion (see ECF No. 25) and, on September 24, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that Bank of America’s Motion to Dismiss be granted without prejudice for failure to state a claim, and for failure to prosecute and follow court orders. (ECF No. 30). Plaintiff did not file any objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has expired. On September 20,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.