Marisa Rodusky v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20192:18-cv-08505California3,800 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ) MARISA RODUSKY, ) Case No. CV 18-08505-JEM ) Plaintiff, ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER v. ) AFFIRMING DECISION OF THE ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

ANDREW M. SAUL, )

15 Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ) 17 PROCEEDINGS On October 3, 2018, Marisa Rodusky (“Plaintiff” or “Claimant”) filed a complaint seeking 20 review of the decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying 21 Plaintiff’s applications for Child’s Insurance benefits and for Supplemental Security Income 22 benefits. (Dkt. 1.) The Commissioner filed an Answer on February 4, 2019. (Dkt. 16.) On 23 May 10, 2019, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation (“JS”). (Dkt. 19.) The matter is now ready for 24 decision. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), both parties consented to proceed before this 26 Magistrate Judge. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.