Stephanie Medina v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20192:18-cv-09183California3,176 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEPHANIE M., Case No. 2:18-cv-09183-GJS

Plaintiff

v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

ORDER

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,2 15 Defendant.

17 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff Stephanie M. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). The parties filed consents to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge [Dkts. 10 and 12] and briefs addressing disputed issues in the case [Dkt. 20 (“Pl. Br.”) and Dkt. 24 (“Def. Br.”)]. The matter is now ready for decision. For the reasons discussed below, the Court

In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party. 27 Andrew M. Saul, now Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, is 28 substituted as defendant for Nancy A.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.