Stephanie Medina v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
STEPHANIE M., Case No. 2:18-cv-09183-GJS
Plaintiff
v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND
ORDER
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,2 15 Defendant.
17 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff Stephanie M. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). The parties filed consents to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge [Dkts. 10 and 12] and briefs addressing disputed issues in the case [Dkt. 20 (“Pl. Br.”) and Dkt. 24 (“Def. Br.”)]. The matter is now ready for decision. For the reasons discussed below, the Court
In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party. 27 Andrew M. Saul, now Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, is 28 substituted as defendant for Nancy A.…