David Arnold v. City of Redondo Beach

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

IN RE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH Case № 2:17-cv-09097-ODW (SKx) FLSA LITIGATION

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT [32] AND

DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [38]

17 I. INTRODUCTION One hundred and fifteen police officers and fire fighters (“Plaintiffs”) sued the 20 City of Redondo Beach (“City”) in a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards 21 Act (“FLSA”) for alleged miscalculation of overtime compensation. Now before the 22 Court are the City’s and Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment or Partial 23 Summary Judgment (“Motions”). (City’s Mot. for Summ. J. (“City Mot.”), ECF 24 No. 32; Pls.’ Mot. for Summ. J. (“Pls.’ Mot.”), ECF No. 38.) For the reasons that 25 follow, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the City’s Motion and 26 DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion.1

28 1 After carefully considering the papers filed in connection with the Motions, the Court deemed the…