Austin Myers v. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
I. BACKGROUND
The following facts are based on the evidence, as viewed in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, the non-moving party. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255 (1986) (On a motion for summary judgment, “[t]he evidence of the non- movant is to be believed, and all justifiable inferences are to be drawn in his [or her] favor.”). Plaintiff Austin Myers is an employee of WFS “at 2141 Rosecrans Avenue, El Segundo, Los Angeles County, California.” (First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) ¶ 1) (Docket No. 1-1). Defendant WFS is a corporation formed under the laws of the State of Delaware. (See Notice of Removal (“NoR”) at 6 (Docket No. 1)). WFS’s principal place of business is in Charlotte, North Carolina, which is where WFS’s corporate headquarters and executive offices are located and where WFS’s high level-officers coordinate its executive and administrative functions, such as strategic decision making, legal, human resources, accounting, and finance. (Id. (citing Declaration of Brian Farrell (“Farrell Decl.”) ¶ 2 (Docket No. 3)). ______________________________________________________________________________