Todd Meyer v. Fifth Third Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20198:19-cv-01803California2,327 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Background

A. Facts The following facts are drawn from Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. 1-1). Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of the former stockholders (the “Sellers”) of Celtic Leasing Corporation (“Celtic”), formerly an equipment leasing company located in Irvine, California. Compl. ¶¶ 1, 3. In December 2012, the Sellers and MB Financial Bank, N.A. (“MB Financial”) entered into the Stock Purchase Agreement (“SPA”). Id. ¶ 5. Under the SPA, the Sellers agreed to sell their stock in Celtic to MB Financial for an initial base purchase price, plus additional payments defined as Contingent Purchase Price

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. SA CV 19-1803-DOC-DFM Date: November 26, 2019 Page

Consideration (“CPPC”). Id. ¶ 6. These CPPC payments would be paid from December 2012 through December 2022. Id. To safeguard the future CPPC payments, the SPA contains several requirements—e.g., that the purchaser conduct an annual accounting, that the purchaser will not take intentional action to diminish the CPPC, and so on. Id. ¶¶ 8-11.

In March 2019, Defendant Fifth Third Bank (“Defendant”) acquired MB Financial, including MB Financial’s rights and obligations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.