Anita Kay Virden v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20195:19-cv-00063California5,350 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

19 Plaintiff Anita K. V. (“Plaintiff”) challenges the Commissioner’s denial of her 20 application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”), 21 supplemental security income (“SSI”), and disabled widow’s benefits (“DWB”). For 22 the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. 23 /// 24 25 1 Partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 27 2 Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Andrew Saul, the current Commissioner of Social Security, is hereby substituted as the defendant herein. II. PROCEEDINGS BELOW On October 28, 2014, Plaintiff filed an application for a period of disability, DIB, and DWB alleging disability beginning on November 30, 2011. (Administrative Record (“AR”) 257-58.) The same day, Plaintiff also protectively filed an application for SSI under Title XVI alleging disability beginning on October 28, 2005. (AR 259-64.) Her application for a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.