Dr. Andrew Kerr v. Endologix, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DR. ANDREW KERR, CASE NO. 8:19-cv-01457-DOC-JDE
Plaintiff,
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
vs. ORDER
ENDOLOGIX, INC.,
TRIVASCULAR
TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and
TRIVASCULAR, INC.,
16 Defendant.
18 Pursuant to the Stipulation (Dkt. 36) between Dr. Andrew Kerr (“Plaintiff”) 19 and Defendants Endologix, Inc., TriVascular, Inc., and TriVascular Technologies, 20 Inc. (collectively “Endologix” or “Defendants”), and good cause appearing 21 therefore, the Court makes the following findings and enters the following Order: 22 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 23 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 24 proprietary or private information for which special protection from public 25 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than pursuing this litigation may be 26 warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 27 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 28 Order does not confer blanket protections…