Samuel Enin v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20195:18-cv-02609California4,192 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SAMUEL E.,1 Case No. 5:18-cv-02609-AFM 12 Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

13 v.

ORDER AFFIRMING DECISION

14 ANDREW M. SAUL, OF THE COMMISSIONER 15 Commissioner of Social Security,2 16 Defendant. 17 Plaintiff filed this action seeking review of the Commissioner’s final decision 18 denying his applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security 19 income. In accordancewith the Court’s case management order, the parties have filed 20 memorandum briefs addressing the merits of the disputed issues. The matter is now 21 ready for decision. 22 23 24 1 Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case 26 Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 27 2 Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.