Brian Whitaker v. Kamal Madjidi
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20192:19-cv-10079California516 words
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. CV 19-10079-CJC-SS Date: December 4, 2019
Title: BRIAN WHITAKER v. KAMAL MADJIDI
PRESENT:
HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Gabriela Garcia N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:
None Present None Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY
THIS COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL
JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF’S UNRUH ACT CLAIM
On November 26, 2019, Plaintiff Brian Whitaker filed this action against Defendant Kamal Madjidi, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”). (Dkt. 1 [Complaint].) Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief under the ADA and statutory damages under the Unruh Act. (Id. at 6.) Plaintiff contends that this Court has federal question jurisdiction over his ADA claim and supplemental jurisdiction over his Unruh Act claim. (Id. ¶¶ 5–6.)