George Estrada v. Marriott International Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20192:19-cv-07869California1,509 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No.: CV 19-07869 AB (JPRx) Date: December 4, 2019

Title: George Estrada v. Marriott International Inc. et al

Present: The Honorable ANDRE BIROTTE JR., United States District Judge Carla Badirian N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Appearing None Appearing

Proceedings: [In Chambers] ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR REMAND

Before the Court is Plaintiff George Estrada’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Remand (“Motion,” Dkt. No. 9). Defendants Marriott International et al. (“Defendants”) filed an opposition and Plaintiff filed a reply. The Motion is

DENIED.

I BACKGROUND

On February 5, 2019, Plaintiff filed his initial Complaint in state court alleging negligence and premises liability against Defendants arising out of a slip- and-fall accident Plaintiff suffered at Defendants’ hotel. On May 1, 2019, Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). See Kasparian Decl. (Dkt. No. 9) Ex. 6. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.