Ronald Robinson v. Ralph M. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20192:19-cv-09894California1,664 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

On November 19, 2019, Ronald Robinson (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Petition”). [Dkt. No. 1]. Petitioner asserts (1) retaliation by prison staff for appealing an unsatisfactory work evaluation and (2) due process violations when prison staff issued the work evaluation depicting Petitioner’s performance as “sub-par”. [Id. at 5]. For the reasons set forth below, the Petition appears subject to dismissal for failure to name a proper respondent and failure to state a cognizable claim for habeas relief. The Court will not make a final determination regarding whether the Petition should be dismissed, however, without giving Petitioner an opportunity to address these issues.

II. SCREENING REQUIREMENT

Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, this court is required to conduct a preliminary review of all petitions for writ of habeas corpus filed by state prisoners. Pursuant to Rule 4, this court must summarily dismiss a petition if it “plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.