Yuriria Diaz v. Macys West Stores, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20198:19-cv-00303California2,458 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

O 1

2 3 4 5 6 7

8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California

10

11 YURIRIA DIAZ, as an individual and on Case № 8:19-cv-00303-ODW (MAAx) behalf of others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 MACY’S WEST STORES, INC. dba AMENDED ORDER GRANTING 15 Macy’s, an Ohio corporation, and DOES 16 1-50, inclusive MOTION TO DISMISS [20]

17 Defendants.

18 19 I. INTRODUCTION 20 Before the Court is Defendant Macy’s West Stores, Inc. dba Macy’s (“Macy’s”) 21 Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim and failure to exhaust administrative 22 requirements. (Mot. to Dismiss (“Mot.”), ECF No. 20.)1 For the following reasons, 23 Macy’s Motion is GRANTED. 24 II. BACKGROUND 25 On November 20, 2018, Plaintiff Yuriria Diaz—a former retail worker—filed 26 this wage and hour action in the Superior Court of California, on behalf of herself and 27

28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.