Anthony A. Patel v. Charles Robinson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20192:19-cv-02851California540 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 19-02851-DOC (DFM) Date: December 2, 2019 Title Anthony A. Patel v. Charles Robinson et al.

Present: The Honorable Douglas F. McCormick, United States Magistrate Judge Denise Vo Not Present Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorney(s) for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) for Defendant(s): Not Present Not Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Why the First Amended Consolidated Complaint Should Not Be Dismissed

On October 11, 2019, the Court issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending that Plaintiff’s Consolidated Complaint be dismissed in part with leave to amend and in part without leave to amend. See Dkt. 197. On October 30, the District Judge accepted the R&R. See Dkt. 218. On November 27, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Consolidated Complaint (“FACC”). See Dkt. 219. Plaintiff again asserts causes of action for deprivation of federal civil rights under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 and violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”). Although improved, the FACC suffers…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.