Mark R. Frisby v. The State of California Department of Justice

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20195:19-cv-01249California6,581 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK R. FRISBY, Case No. 5:19-cv-01249-DSF (MAA) 12 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND

ORDER DISMISSING FIRST

13 v.

AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH

14 LEAVE TO AMEND

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

15 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 16 Defendant. 1 17 8

19 I. INTRODUCTION 20 On July 8, 2019, Plaintiff Mark. R. Frisby (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, 21 filed a Complaint alleging violations of his civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 22 (“Section 1983”). (Compl., ECF No. 1.) On August 7, 2019, the Court dismissed 23 the Complaint with leave to amend. (Order Dismiss Compl., ECF No. 8) Plaintiff 24 filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on October 25, 2019. (FAC, ECF No. 25 12.) The Court has screened the FAC as prescribed by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 26 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). For the reasons stated below, the FAC is DISMISSED 27 WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Plaintiff is ORDERED to, within thirty days after 28 /// 1 the date of this Order, either: (1) file a Second…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.