MGA Entertainment, Inc. v. Dynacraft BSC, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20192:17-cv-08222California1,209 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

O 11

22

33

44 55 66 77 88 United States District Court 99 Central District of California

1100

1111 MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC; THE Case No. 2:17-cv-08222-ODW (KSx)

LITTLE TIKES COMPANY.,

1122 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR Plaintiffs, RECONSIDERATION [109] and 1133 v. DENYING EX PARTE 1144 APPLICATION TO STAY [91] DYNACRAFT BSC, INC., et al. 1155 Defendants. 1166 1177 1188 I. INTRODUCTION 1199 Presently before the Court is Defendant Dynacraft’s (“Dynacraft”) Motion for 2200 Reconsideration of the Court’s Order striking Dynacraft’s Expert Report (“Motion”). 2211 (Mot. for Recons. (“Mot.”), ECF No. 109.) For reasons that follow, Dynacraft’s 2222 Motion is DENIED.1 2233 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 2244 The Court addressed the factual allegations and procedural history relevant to 2255 this case in its Minute Order granting Plaintiffs MGA Entertainment, Inc.’s and The 2266 Little Tikes Company’s (collectively “MGA”) Motion to Strike Late-Served Expert 2277

2288 1 After considering the papers filed in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.