Pacific Trials, LP v. Anthony Grimes

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20192:19-cv-10257California1,187 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT J S-

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

. . Pacific Trials, LP, CASE NUMBER: 10 CV 19-10257-SVW (KSx) Plaintiff v. 13 |) Anthony Grimes et al.,

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO

STATE COURT Defendant(s). 16 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 20 || court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.” 21 || Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great N. Ry. Co. v. 22 |! Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Generally, where Congress has acted to create a right of 23 || removal, those statutes are strictly construed against removal jurisdiction. Id.; Nevada v. Bank of Corp., 672 F.3d 661, 667 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.