Neurotech Forty, Inc. v. Biocybernaut Institute, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20192:19-cv-09410California920 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 19-9410 FMO (DFMx) Date December 10, 2019 Title Neurotech Forty, Inc., et al. v. Biocybernaut Institute, Inc., et al.

Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Cheryl Wynn None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorney Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Re: Personal Jurisdiction and Venue On October 31, 2019, plaintiffs Neurotech Forty, Inc. (“Neurotech”), 40 Years, Inc. (“40 Years”), and Dave Asprey (“Asprey”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”), filed a Complaint against Biocybernaut Institute, Inc. (“Biocybernaut”), Biocybernaut Institute of Arizona, LLC (“Biocybernaut Arizona”), and James Hardt (“Hardt”) (collectively, “defendants”), asserting claims for federal trademark infringement, false designation of origin, false advertising, misappropriation of right of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.