Cynthia L. Reposa v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20192:19-cv-00416California4,432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CYNTHIA L. R., Case No. 2:19-cv-00416-AFM Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

v.

ORDER AFFIRMING DECISION

ANDREW M. SAUL, OF THE COMMISSIONER 15 Commissioner of Social Security,2 Defendant. 17 Plaintiff filed this action seeking review of the Commissioner’s final decision denying her application for supplemental security income. In accordance with the Court’s case management order, the parties have filed memorandum briefs addressing the merits of the disputed issues. The matter is now ready for decision. BACKGROUND In April 2015, Plaintiff applied for supplemental security income, alleging 24 Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 2 Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.