Cynthia L. Reposa v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20192:19-cv-00416California4,432 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CYNTHIA L. R.,1 Case No. 2:19-cv-00416-AFM 12 Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

13 v.

ORDER AFFIRMING DECISION

14 ANDREW M. SAUL, OF THE COMMISSIONER 15 Commissioner of Social Security,2 16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff filed this action seeking review of the Commissioner’s final decision 19 denying her application for supplemental security income. In accordance with the 20 Court’s case management order, the parties have filed memorandum briefs 21 addressing the merits of the disputed issues. The matter is now ready for decision. 22 BACKGROUND 23 In April 2015, Plaintiff applied for supplemental security income, alleging 24 25 1 Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case 26 Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 27 2 Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.