Antonio Fernandez v. Tom Paziouros

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20192:19-cv-05055California589 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 ANTONIO FERNANDEZ, ) CV 19-05055-RSWL-SK ) 13 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: 14 ) SUBJECT MATTER v. ) JURISDICTION 15 ) ) 16 TOM PAZIOUROS, and DOES 1 ) to 10, ) 17 ) ) 18 Defendants. ) ) 19 ) ) 20 ) 21 Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez (“Plaintiff”) filed his 22 Complaint [1] against Defendant Tom Paziouros 23 (“Defendant”) on June 11, 2019, alleging violations of 24 the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the 25 Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”). 26 In order to “invoke jurisdiction of the federal 27 court, a disabled individual claiming discrimination 28 must satisfy the case or controversy requirement of 1 Article III by demonstrating his standing to sue at 2 each stage of the litigation.” Chapman v. Pier 1 3 Imports (U.S.), Inc., 631 F.3d 939,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.