Onni South Hill, LP v. Andrew Knight

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20192:19-cv-10185California1,118 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JS-6 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OMNI SOUTH HILL, LP, Case No. CV 19-10185-ODW(RAO) 12 Plaintiff,

13 v. ORDER REMANDING ACTION

AND DENYING REQUEST TO

14 ANDREW KNIGHT, et al., PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. 18

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

19 Plaintiff Omni South Hill, LP (“Plaintiff”) filed an unlawful detainer action 20 in Los Angeles County Superior Court against Defendants Andrew Knight, Carol 21 Aitcheson, and Does 1 to 10 (“Defendants”). Amended First Notice of Motion to 22 Remand to State Court, Attached Complaint (“Compl.”), Dkt. No. 7 at 11-15. 23 Defendants are allegedly occupants of real property owned by Plaintiff and located 24 in Los Angeles, California. Compl. ¶¶ 1-6. Plaintiff filed the unlawful detainer 25 action seeking forfeiture of the rental agreement, monetary damages, and 26 reasonable attorney fees. Id. at ¶ 17. 27 /// 28 1 Defendant Knight filed a Notice of Removal on December 2, 2019, invoking 2 the Court’s federal question and diversity…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.