John Entwistle v. Walmart Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20192:19-cv-08756California1,476 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. Background

On April 12, 2019, Plaintiff filed this case in Los Angeles Superior Court, asserting claims against Defendant for negligence and premises liability. See Complaint, Dkt. # 1-1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiff attached a statement of damages to the complaint, which stated that Plaintiff sought more than $5 million in general damages and almost $70,000 in special damages. See First Statement of Damages, Dkt. # 8-3 (“First SOD”); Proof of Service, Dkt. # 8- 2, at 1. On May 14, 2019, Defendant was served with the summons, complaint, the statement of damages, and other documents. See Notice of Removal, Dkt. # 1 (“NOR”), ¶¶ 2; Proof of Service at 1. Defendant filed an answer and produced initial discovery shortly after. See Opp. 2:23–24. In June 2019, Defendant served a request for a statement of damages and a set of special interrogatories requesting information on Plaintiff’s citizenship. See id. 2:25–28. On August 14, 2019, Plaintiff provided Defendant with his set of special interrogatory responses “wherein he admitted that he is a citizen of California.” Opp. 3:1; Defendant’s Special Interrogatories, Dkt. # 8-7, No. 21; Plaintiff’s Responses to Defendant’s Special…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.