Audrey Heredia v. Sunrise Senior Living LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20198:18-cv-01974California23,107 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION AUDREY HEREDIA, as successor-in- CASE NO. 8:18-cv-01974-JLS-JDEx interest to the Estate of Carlos Heredia; AMY FEARN, as successor-in-interest to the Estate of Edith Zack; and HELEN GANZ, by and through her Guardian ad PROTECTIVE ORDER Litem, Elise Ganz; on their own behalves and on behalf of others similarly situated, [NOTE CHANGES BY THE COURT] Plaintiffs, 16 v. [Discovery Document: Referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early] SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING, LLC; and DOES 1 through 100, Defendants.

21 Based on the Joint Submission Regarding Stipulated Protective Order (Dkt. 101) and arguments of counsel for the parties, the Court finds and orders as follows. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary or private information, including…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.