Jessica J. Mosaquites v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20195:18-cv-01993California4,640 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 JESSICA M., 1 Case No. 5:18-cv-01993-GJS

12 Plaintiff

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

13 v. ORDER

14 ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 18 Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking review of Defendant Commissioner of 19 Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) denial of her applications for Disability 20 Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). The parties 21 filed consents to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge 22 [Dkts. 12, 13] and briefs addressing disputed issues in the case [Dkt. 21 (“Pl.’s Br.”) 23 and Dkt. 25 (“Def.’s Br.”)]. The Court has taken the parties’ briefing under 24 submission without oral argument. For the reasons discussed below, the Court finds 25 that this matter should be affirmed. 26

27 1 Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.