Frederick Banks v. Central Intelligence Agency

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20192:19-cv-10468California2,649 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 WOMEN IN MEXICO CITY & Case No. 2:19-cv-10468-ODW (GJS) MEXICO, Individually, & 12 FREDERICK BANKS as next friend ORDER DISMISSING PETITION thereto & Individually, 13 Petitioner 14 v. 15

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE

16 AGENCY, et al., 17 Respondents.

18 19 On December 11, 2019, a putative 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition was filed in 20 this District [Dkt. 1, “Petition”]. The Petition was filed by Frederick Banks, a 21 convicted criminal incarcerated in Allegheny County Jail in Pittsburgh, 22 Pennsylvania, who purports to be acting as “next friend” on behalf of, and as the 23 “self-appointed agent” for, all women in Mexico and in Mexico City, as well as to 24 seek individual relief on his own behalf. The only person who has signed the 25 Petition is Banks, who mailed the Petition to the Court from Allegheny County Jail 26 and who seeks leave to proceed on an in forma pauperis basis. 27 The Petition names as Respondents: the Central Intelligence agency (“CIA”); 28 Michael Atkinson, who is identified as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.