Haitham Saeed v. Scott Wilkinson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20192:19-cv-08634California514 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 19-8634 FMO (AGRx) Date December 13, 2019 Title Haitham Saeed v. Scott Wilkinson, et al.

Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Cheryl Wynn None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorney Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Re: Consolidation of Actions On October 7, 2019, plaintiff Haitham Saeed (“plaintiff Saeed”) filed a shareholder derivative complaint on behalf of Inogen, Inc. (“Inogen”) against various of Inogen’s corporate officers (collectively, “defendants”). (See Haitham Saeed v. Scott Wilkinson, et al., Case No. CV 19-8634 FMO (AGRx) (C.D. Cal.) (“Saeed”), Dkt. 1, “Saeed Complaint” at Jf] 1, 31-78). Plaintiff Saeed alleges claims for violation of section 14(a) of the Exchange Act, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and waste of corporate assets.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.