Patricia Ann Flynn v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20195:19-cv-00195California3,020 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

BACKGROUND

22 Plaintiff filed an application for Social Security disability insurance benefits 23 on November 17, 2014, claiming a disability onset date of October 29, 2014. 24 (Administrative Record (“AR”) 125, 209.) Her claim was initially denied on 25 26 27 1 Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case 28 Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 1 April 29, 2015 and upon reconsideration. (AR 141-145.) Plaintiff testified at a 2 hearing held on September 5, 2017. (AR 44-104.) Also testifying was a vocational 3 expert (“VE”). (AR 44-104.) On February 28, 2018, Plaintiff was notified of an 4 unfavorable decision by the ALJ. (AR 14-33.) The Appeals Council denied review, 5 making the ALJ’s decision the Commissioner’s final decision. (AR 1-4.) 6 DISPUTED ISSUES 7 1. Whether the ALJ properly evaluated the medical evidence of record. 8 2. Whether the ALJ properly evaluated Plaintiff’s subjective symptom 9 complaints. 10 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.