Mynor F. Portillo v. Icon Health and Fitness, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20192:19-cv-01428California3,884 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 O

2 3 4 5

6

7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9

10 11 MYNOR F. PORTILLO, Case No. 2:19-cv-01428-ODW(PJWx)

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

13 v. ICON HEALTH & FITNESS, INC.’S 14 MOTION TO DISMISS THE ICON HEALTH & FITNESS, INC., et al., COMPLAINT UNDER RULE 12(b)(6) 15 [11] Defendants. 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant ICON Health & Fitness, 20 Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 11.) For the 21 following reasons, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion.1 22 II. BACKGROUND 23 On February 26, 2019, Plaintiff Mynor F. Portillo filed a putative class action 24 against ICON and other unnamed Defendants. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) Portillo alleges 25 a single cause of action under California Penal Code (“CPC”) section 632.7 (part of 26

27 1 After carefully considering the papers filed in support of the Motion,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.