Thomas Martin Snyder v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20195:19-cv-00526California9,121 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EASTERN DIVISION 11 12 THOMAS M. S., ) No. ED CV 19-526-PLA ) 13 Plaintiff, ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ) 14 v. ) ) 15 ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER )

OF SOCIAL SECURITY )

16 ADMINISTRATION, ) ) 17 Defendant. ) ) 18 19 I. 20 PROCEEDINGS 21 Thomas M. S.1 (“plaintiff”) filed this action on March 23, 2019, seeking review of the 22 Commissioner’s2 denial of his application for Supplemental Security Income payments (“SSI”). 23 The parties filed Consents to proceed before a Magistrate Judge on April 10, 2019, and April 11, 24 1 In the interest of protecting plaintiff’s privacy, this Memorandum Opinion and Order uses 25 plaintiff’s (1) first name and middle and last initials, and (2) year of birth in lieu of a complete birth 26 date. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(c)(2)(B), Local Rule 5.2-1. 27 2 Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.