Donte Markell Henry v. Anthony King

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20195:19-cv-01915California442 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EASTERN DIVISION 11 DONTE MARKELL HENRY, ) No. 5:19-cv-01915-GW (JDE) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DISMISSING 13 v. ) COMPLAINT ) 14 ANTHONY KING, et al., ) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) 17 On October 7, 2019, Donte Markell Henry (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro 18 se and then an inmate at the West Valley Detention Center in Rancho 19 Cucamonga, California, filed a civil rights complaint asserting claims for 20 damages against government employees relating to his arrest and confinement. 21 Dkt. 1. The Complaint was not accompanied by a filing fee or a request to 22 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). 23 All parties instituting any civil action in a district court, except an 24 application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $400. 1 See 28 25 1 In addition to a $350 filing fee, civil litigants must pay an administrative fee 26 of $50. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914 (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.