Gale Marie Williams v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20195:18-cv-01023California2,926 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – EASTERN DIVISION 10 11 GALE MARIE WILLIAMS, Case No. EDCV 18-1023-AS 12 Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM OPINION

13 v. 14 ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,1 15 Defendant. 16

17

PROCEEDINGS

18 19 On May 11, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Complaint seeking review 20 of the Commissioner’s denial of Plaintiff’s applications for a 21 period of disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”), 22 and supplemental security income (“SSI”), respectively, under 23 Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. (Dkt. No. 1). On 24 October 10, 2018, Defendant filed an Answer and the Administrative 25 26 1 Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, is 27 substituted for his predecessor. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). 28 1 Record (“AR”). (Dkt. Nos. 16-17). The parties have consented to 2 proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. (Dkt. Nos. 11- 3 12). On December 29, 2018, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation 4 (“Joint Stip.”) setting forth their respective positions regarding 5 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.