Jorge Castillo v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20192:18-cv-09924California4,403 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 JORGE CASTILLO CASE NO.: CV 18-09924-R-SK 12 Plaintiff,

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

13 ORDER 14 vs.

15 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al.

16 Defendants. 17

18 19 20 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 21 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 22 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 23 and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 24 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the 25 following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does 26 not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the 27 protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited 28 information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable 1 legal principles. 2 The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.