Diane R. Mycroft v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
I.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff filed an application for DIB and alleged disability beginning on February 18, 2015. See Administrative Record (“AR”) 145. After a hearing, an
1 The Court partially redacts Plaintiff’s name in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) issued an unfavorable decision on January 23, 2018. See AR 13-22. The ALJ concluded that Plaintiff had the severe impairments of degenerative disc disease and obesity. See AR 15. The ALJ also concluded that Plaintiff did not have an impairment or combination of impairments that met or medically equaled one of the listed impairments. See AR 17. The ALJ then determined that Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity (“RFC”) limited her to light work with certain additional limitations. See AR 18. The ALJ concluded that Plaintiff was not disabled, because she could perform her past work as a clerk, cable assembler, and repair clerk, assembler, as generally performed. See AR 21-22. This action followed. See Dkt. 1.