Errol Locke v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
O 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 11 PLAINTIFFS IN PRO PER ERROL AND Case No. 2:19-cv-08854-ODW (JPRx) 12 TABATHA LOCKE,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
13 Plaintiffs,
MOTION TO DISMISS [7]
14 v.
15 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AND 16 AMERICA’S SERVICING COMPANY, 17 Defendants. 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiffs Errol and Tabatha Locke, proceeding pro se, bring this action against 20 various Defendants for multiple claims based on an alleged wrongful foreclosure sale 21 of real property located at 2116 West 77th Street, Los Angeles, California 90047 (the 22 “Subject Property”). (See Notice of Removal (“Removal”) Ex A (“Compl.”) ¶ 1, ECF 23 No. 1.) Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) moves to dismiss 24 Plaintiffs’ Complaint. (Mot. to Dismiss (“Mot.”), ECF No. 7.) 25 For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to 26 Dismiss. 27 28 1 II. BACKGROUND 2 In 2005, Plaintiffs took out a loan in the amount of $340,000 backed by a deed 3 of trust in the Subject Property. (Req. for …