Mehrnaz Assef v. Johnson and Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20192:19-cv-10564California1,512 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 19-10564 FMO (ASx) Date December 23, 2019 Title Mehrnaz Assef v. Johnson and Johnson, et al.

Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Cheryl Wynn None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorney Present for Plaintiff: Attorney Present for Defendant: None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order Remanding Action On November 7, 2019, Mehrnaz Assef (“plaintiff”) filed a Complaint in the Los Angeles County Superior Court against Johnson and Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (collectively, “Johnson defendants”) and Imerys Talc America, Inc. (collectively, “defendants”). (See Dkt. 1, Notice of Removal (“NOR”) at ¶ 1). On December 13, 2019, the Johnson defendants removed that action on diversity jurisdiction grounds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (See Dkt. 1, NOR at ¶ 7). Having reviewed the NOR, the court hereby remands this action to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c).

LEGAL STANDARD

“Federal courts are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.