Emma L. Verlin Scott v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 O 2 3 4 5 6 7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 10 11 EMMA S.,1 Case No. 5:18-cv-02338-MAA 12 Plaintiff,
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND
13 v. ORDER AFFIRMING DECISION OF
THE COMMISSIONER
14 15
ANDREW M. SAUL,2
Commissioner of Social Security, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 On October 31, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Complaint seeking review of the Social 20 Security Commissioner’s final decision terminating her Supplemental Security 21 Income benefits, which she had been receiving pursuant to Title XVI of the Social 22 Security Act. This matter is fully briefed and ready for decision. For the reasons 23 discussed below, the Commissioner’s final decision is affirmed, and this action is 24 dismissed with prejudice.
25 1 Plaintiff’s name is partially redacted in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court 26 Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 27 2 The Commissioner of Social Security is substituted as the Defendant pursuant to 28 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…