Glorianne Mendoza v. ALDI Inc.

O

JS-

2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 11 GLORIANNE MENDOZA, et al. Case № 2:19-cv-06870-ODW (JEMx) Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. REMAND [8] and 14 ALDI INC., et al. DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS Defendants. AS MOOT [25] 16 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Glorianne Mendoza’s motion to remand 19 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (“Motion”). (Mot. to Remand (“Mot.”), ECF 20 No. 8.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the Motion.1 II. BACKGROUND Mendoza was employed with Defendants ALDI INC. and AI CALIFORNIA 23 LLC (collectively “Defendants”) from approximately February 2016 to March 2019. 24 (First Am. Compl. (“FAC”) ¶ 21, ECF No. 15.) When Mendoza applied for 25 employment, Defendants performed a background investigation on her using legally 26 noncompliant disclosure and authorization forms. (FAC ¶¶ 22–23, 31, 34.)

28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed…