Sharon Smason v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHARON SMASON, Case No. 2:18-cv-05924-DMG-MAA
12 Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS 13 v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
14 ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner JUDGE of Social Security, 15 16 Defendant. 17
18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint and all 19 other records on file, as well as the Report and Recommendation of the United 20 States Magistrate Judge [“R&R,” Doc. # 26]. 21 Plaintiff submitted a letter addressed to the Magistrate Judge dated August 22 12, 2019. [Doc. # 27.] The letter violates Local Rule 83-2.5, which provides that 23 “parties to any action or proceeding shall refrain from writing letters to the judge.” 24 The Court previously warned Plaintiff not to submit letters to the judge. (See Doc. 25 # 21.) Nevertheless, because the letter appears to be responsive to the R&R (see 26 Doc. # 27 at 3 (“I OBJECT. I DO DESERVE DISABILITY.”)), the Court filed the 27 letter and construed it as Plaintiff’s…