Shawn Jones v. Kelly Santoro

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20202:19-cv-10868California1,816 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 SHAWN JONES, Case No. 2:19-cv-10868-ODW-KES

12 Petitioner,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

13 v.

PETITION SHOULD NOT BE

14 KELLY SANTORO, Warden, DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY

15 Respondent.

16

17 On December 17, 2019 (per proof of service), Shawn Jones (“Petitioner”)

18 constructively filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State

19 Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (the “Petition”). (Dkt. 1.) As discussed

20 more fully below, the Court orders Petitioner to show cause why the Petition should 21 not be dismissed as untimely. 22 I. 23 BACKGROUND 24 The following facts are taken from the Petition, from the Court’s own 25 records, or from public records; where necessary, the Court takes judicial notice of 26 the latter. See Fed. R. Evid. 201(b)(2) (“The court may judicially notice a fact that 27 is not subject to reasonable dispute because it … can be accurately and readily 28 determined…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.