Rosaura Aguirre Cordero v. Walmart Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20202:19-cv-09946California1,040 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On June 5, 2017, Plaintiff fell while shopping at a Walmart store located in Downey, California, and sustained injuries to her back, right elbow, right shoulder, left foot, and left knee. On April 25, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Walmart and Does 1 to 30 in Los Angeles County Superior Court, alleging claims for negligence and premises liability. On November 7, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Doe Amendment to the Complaint naming Nelisa Blackwell as a co- defendant. On November 14, 2019, Walmart filed a Notice of Removal of Action Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sections 1332 and 1441(a) and (b) (“Notice of Removal”), alleging that this Court has diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). At the time of removing this action, Walmart was apparently unaware that Plaintiff had filed a Doe Amendment naming Nelisa Blackwell as a co-defendant.1 In its Notice of Removal, Walmart 1 alleged that Plaintiff was a citizen of California and that it was a citizen of Delaware and Arkansas, but failed to allege the citizenship of Defendant Nelisa Blackwell. Plaintiff moves to remand this action, arguing in relevant part that the parties are not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.