Arlene R. Atherton v. Beverly Hills Public Library

1 2

3

4 5 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

9 10 ARLENE R. ATHERTON, Case No. CV 19-10167-CJC (KK) 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

13 BEVERLY HILLS PUBLIC LIBRARY,

ET AL.,

14 Defendants. 15 16 17 I. 18 INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff Arlene R. Atherton (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma 20 pauperis, filed a “civil rights” Complaint pursuant to the Americans With Disabilities 21 Act (“ADA”) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”). For the reasons discussed 22 below, the Court dismisses the Complaint with leave to amend. 23 II. 24 ALLEGATIONS IN THE COMPLAINT 25 On November 27, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint under the ADA and 26 Section 1983. ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 1. Although not entirely clear, the 27 Complaint appears to sue the Beverly Hills Library and Beverly Hills Police 1 Defendants violated her constitutional rights and failed to accommodate her traumatic 2 brain injury when she was removed from…