Arlene R. Atherton v. Beverly Hills Public Library

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20202:19-cv-10167California2,517 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 ARLENE R. ATHERTON, Case No. CV 19-10167-CJC (KK) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

BEVERLY HILLS PUBLIC LIBRARY,

ET AL.,

14 Defendants. 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Arlene R. Atherton (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a “civil rights” Complaint pursuant to the Americans With Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”). For the reasons discussed below, the Court dismisses the Complaint with leave to amend. II. ALLEGATIONS IN THE COMPLAINT On November 27, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint under the ADA and Section 1983. ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 1. Although not entirely clear, the Complaint appears to sue the Beverly Hills Library and Beverly Hills Police Defendants violated her constitutional rights and failed to accommodate her traumatic brain injury when she was removed from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.