Hassaun Cecil Haygood v. J. Gastelo

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20205:19-cv-01527California320 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 HASSAUN CECIL HAYGOOD, ) Case No. 5:19-cv-01527-CAS-JC ) 12 ) (PROPOSED) Petitioner, ) 13 ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, v. ) CONCLUSIONS, AND 14 ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF

J. GASTELO, ) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

15 ) JUDGE ) 16 Respondent. ) ________________________________ 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of 19 Habeas Corpus (“Petition”) and accompanying documents, the August 21, 2019 20 Order to Show Cause and petitioner’s Response thereto, and all of the records 21 herein, including the December 18, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United 22 States Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation”), and petitioner’s 23 objections to the Report and Recommendation (“Objections”). The Court has 24 further made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and 25 Recommendation to which objection is made. To the extent petitioner contends…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.