Arman Maldini v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20202:19-cv-10579California867 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 19-10579 PA (JEMx) Date January 8, 2020 Title Arman Maldini v. Ford Motor Company et al.

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Kamilla Sali-Suleyman Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER The Court is in receipt of a Notice of Removal filed by defendant Ford Motor Company (“Defendant”). (Docket No. 1.) The Notice alleges the Court possesses diversity Jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. For the reasons discussed below, the Court remands this case to the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles because the Notice of Removal was untimely. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, having subject matter jurisdiction only over matters authorized by the Constitution and Congress. See Kokkonen v,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.