Cecilia Baumgarten v. Strivectin Operating Company, Inc.
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20202:19-cv-10610California531 words
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Case No. CV 19-10610 DMG (SSx) Date January 8, 2020
Title Cecilia Baumgarten v. StriVectin Operating Co., et al. Page 1 of 2
Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
KANE TIEN NOT REPORTED
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present
Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED TO STATE
COURT FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
On December 16, 2019, Defendants StriVectin Operating Company and StriVectin Holdings, LLC filed a notice of removal on the basis of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Not. of Removal at 2 [Doc. # 1]. The removal statute—28 U.S.C. § 1441(a)—is strictly construed against removal jurisdiction, and if there is any doubt as to the right of removal in the first instance, federal jurisdiction must be rejected. Geographic Expeditions, Inc. v. Estate of Lhotka ex rel. Lhotka, 599…