David W. Peebles v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20202:18-cv-08140California5,796 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID W. P., ) NO. CV 18-8140-KS

11 Plaintiff, )

v. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

) ) ANDREW M. SAUL,2 Commissioner ) of Social Security, ) Defendant. ) _________________________________ )

INTRODUCTION 18 David W. P. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint on September 20, 2018, seeking review of the denial of his application for Supplemental Security Insurance (“SSI”). (Dkt. No. 1.) On October 19, 2018, the parties consented, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge. (Dkt. Nos. 11-13.) On June 28, 2019, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation (“Joint Stip.”). (Dkt. No. 24.) Plaintiff seeks an order reversing and remanding the ALJ’s decision. (Joint Stip. at 21.) The Commissioner requests that the ALJ’s

26 Partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.