David W. Peebles v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20202:18-cv-08140California5,796 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

DAVID W. P.,1 ) NO. CV 18-8140-KS

11 Plaintiff, )

12 v. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

) 13 ) ANDREW M. SAUL,2 Commissioner 14 ) of Social Security, ) 15 Defendant. ) 16 _________________________________ )

17 INTRODUCTION 18 19 David W. P. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint on September 20, 2018, seeking review of 20 the denial of his application for Supplemental Security Insurance (“SSI”). (Dkt. No. 1.) On 21 October 19, 2018, the parties consented, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to proceed before the 22 undersigned United States Magistrate Judge. (Dkt. Nos. 11-13.) On June 28, 2019, the parties 23 filed a Joint Stipulation (“Joint Stip.”). (Dkt. No. 24.) Plaintiff seeks an order reversing and 24 remanding the ALJ’s decision. (Joint Stip. at 21.) The Commissioner requests that the ALJ’s 25

26 1 Partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.