Monica Reyes v. Dunbar Armored, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20202:19-cv-10974California476 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. CV 19-10974-DMG (JEMx) Date January 15, 2020

Title Monica Reyes v. Dunbar Armored, Inc., et al. Page 1 of 2

Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

KANE TIEN NOT REPORTED

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED TO STATE COURT FOR LACK OF

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

On December 31, 2019, Defendants Dunbar Armored, Inc., Brink’s Incorporated, and Virginia Fuentes filed a notice of removal on the basis of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Not. of Removal at 2 [Doc. # 1]. The removal statute—28 U.S.C. § 1441(a)—is strictly construed against removal jurisdiction, and if there is any doubt as to the right of removal in the first instance, federal jurisdiction must be rejected. Geographic Expeditions, Inc. v. Estate of Lhotka ex rel. Lhotka, 599 F.3d 1102, 1106-07 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.