Jennifer Rennick v. NPAS Solutions, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20202:19-cv-02495California1,721 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4

7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California

10 11 JENNIFER RENNICK, Case No. 19-cv-02495-ODW(KSx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO STRIKE CLASS ALLEGATIONS [21]

NPAS SOLUTIONS, LLC.,

15 Defendants. 16 I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on Defendant NPAS Solutions, LLC’s 19 Motion to Strike Class Allegations (“Motion”). (ECF No. 21.) For the following 20 reasons, the Court DENIES the Motion.1 II. BACKGROUND On June 20, 2019, Plaintiff Jennifer Rennick filed her First Amended 23 Complaint (“FAC”) against NPAS Solutions. (FAC, ECF No. 15.) Rennick alleges 24 NPAS, a debt collector, called her multiple times on her cellular phone using an 25 automatic telephone dialing system without her express consent, in violation of the 26 27 1 After carefully considering all papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.