Daniel Luis Valadez v. Kim Holland

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20202:15-cv-03976California633 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL LUIS VALADEZ, ) Case No. CV 15-3976-JGB (JPR) Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. Vv. ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE CYNTHIA Y. TAMPKINS, Warden, ) Respondent.

Pursuant to U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the 18 || Petition, First Amended Petition, records on file, and Magistrate 19 || Judge’s June 14, 2016 Report and Recommendation and October 31, 20 || 2019 Supplemental Report and Recommendation, both of which 21 || recommend that judgment be entered denying the Petition and FAP and dismissing this action with prejudice. On July 11, 2016, Petitioner filed Objections to the original R. & R., after which the Magistrate Judge stayed this 25 || case to allow him to exhaust in state court a claim based on 26 || People v. Sanchez, Cal. 4th …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.