Daniel Luis Valadez v. Kim Holland

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20202:15-cv-03976California633 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 5 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL LUIS VALADEZ, ) Case No. CV 15-3976-JGB (JPR) 12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. 13 Vv. ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 CYNTHIA Y. TAMPKINS, Warden, ) 15 Respondent.

17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the 18 || Petition, First Amended Petition, records on file, and Magistrate 19 || Judge’s June 14, 2016 Report and Recommendation and October 31, 20 || 2019 Supplemental Report and Recommendation, both of which 21 || recommend that judgment be entered denying the Petition and FAP 22 | and dismissing this action with prejudice. 23 On July 11, 2016, Petitioner filed Objections to the 24 | original R. & R., after which the Magistrate Judge stayed this 25 || case to allow him to exhaust in state court a claim based on 26 || People v. Sanchez, 63 Cal. 4th …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.